Posted By Rusty Ricketson on February 4, 2012
Last week, President Obama presented a rational for his positions on his political policy by citing several sayings of the Lord Jesus Christ. The most pronounced quotation used by the President was the oft quoted, “Love thy neighbor as thyself.” The President continued: “But for me as a Christian, it also coincides with Jesus’ teaching that “for unto whom much is given, much shall be required.” It mirrors the Islamic belief that those who’ve been blessed have an obligation to use those blessings to help others, or the Jewish doctrine of moderation and consideration for others.”
With this biblical validation, President Obama proceeded to explain why it was imperative for the people of the United States to do what they could for our fellow citizens when he posited that, “now, we can earnestly seek to see these values lived out in our politics and our policies, and we can earnestly disagree on the best way to achieve these values.”
There is no debate regarding whether we should or should not help the poor and all whom we would call our neighbor. However, the President misses an important aspect imbedded within the commands of Jesus. When Jesus commands His followers and all peoples to “love thy neighbor,” He does so knowing that each person has the freedom of conscience to either obey or disobey. God is glorified and honored when His people respond with willing hearts to obey and from their own resources freely give to others. In Acts 2 where the new believers were willingly giving of all they had to those who had need, the point is that they WILLINGLY gave from what each possessed. There was no coercion on the part of any religious order or government.
President Obama fails to see that using the tax code to coerce people into paying more taxes in order for the government to be in a better position to care for the poor short circuits the moral decision that the command of Christ requires. If, under penalty of law, the government commands me to give in order to help my neighbor, freedom of conscience and freedom of personal responsibility are lost. True love, true charity cannot be coerced. It must be a free decision.
The President’s comments have clarified for me some confusion I have had with regard to why more liberal politicians, when their tax forms are open to the public, seem to give substantially less amounts of money to churches and charities than their more conservative counterparts. It is now clear that the President and others who think as he does, consider the government to be the primary arm of help to the poor, not the church. In this line of thinking the government usurps the role of church and gifts (taxes) to the government are viewed similarly as offerings to a church or charity. The idea seems to be that when I pay my taxes I am giving to the poor. As a result, the President can say without any qualm that all of us need to ‘give’ a little more.
I personally don’t have a problem with the idea of those who have been blessed with resources giving to those in need. My problem is that to use the Federal Tax Code as the chief instrument of collecting this “charity” violates the freedom of every individual taxpayer. The President and all future Presidents have the opportunity to lead in this issue by giving freely through churches and charities and encouraging everyone to do the same. But to use the power of the presidency to create a tax code that coerces others to ‘give’ is not leadership. It is a camouflaged form of power and control.
Category: Uncategorized |
3 Comments »
Tags: